Persistent indecisiveness while ignoring obvious facts, though a basis exists to move ahead. This a somewhat bitter observation might serve to sum up fresh annual report by Auditor General Alar Karis. This year, the document offers little that would be new, in its central conclusions stressing stands of earlier overviews.
Pursuant to the report, governmental books are basically okay and state finances decent – both in self-imposed goals and the EU context. «With the three main indicators Europe uses to assess state finances (revenue/expenditure ration, governmental debt and reserves), Estonia is clearly set apart from a Europe languishing in debt crisis,» reads the report. Good to know, of course, but not enough to become a society wealthy in the European sense, admits the Auditor.
Let’s herewith face it: the vital reforms, as also listed in the report – such as the much-talked-about reforms of state, local government; sustainability of social system, oil shale energy issues, etc – take political will to decide. Estonia is a parliamentarian state. Meaning: while talking about the standstill, Auditor General is willingly or unwillingly shooting arrows of criticism towards representative democracy. Even so, the face of the Riigikogu is determined by will of the voter.
In reality, Estonia is no exception – the Old World at large is facing these same problems (aging of the population, urbanisation etc). Behind the sharp changes ignoring involvement, populism and extremism are lurking – awaiting their time bounce. Increasingly, those seeking election need to communicate with voters, to clarify the need for changes so we would continue to feel secure – both economically and security-wise.
In pre-election domestic policy in Estonia, developments of principle do surface. In the larger parliamentary parties, visible movements are underway. Increasingly, the younger generation is rising to the executive political layers – the regained independence timers. Lots on new names in politics – and may the trend continue. Two new parties have been established, aimed at making it to Riigikogu. Civil society is making progress and active people are seeking ways to have a say, and this they are allowed to do – an example being the local budgets considering such voices.
Surely, these signs aren’t a random development. Partly, this must be the overall sense of changes in the air regarding attitudes and mindsets – as stated by Auditor General (and by opinion leaders, observers, think-tanks...). The collective will, shall we say. Thus, there’s hope for boldness of decisions arising from soundness of minds as advised in the report.
