Turned out, it wasn’t that bad: while smoking, the lad had accidentally burned a hole in his coat and to explain that to parents something had to be invented. So he improvised. Three weeks later, as the police had analysed the security videos in the neighbourhood and concluded it was far from robbery, the lad confessed his guilt. «But for us, the investigators wasted three valuable weeks,» said Mr Tambre.
The rule of thumb seems to be that about a fifth of all reports on thefts contain some false information. They either add items to the list of what was stolen, hoping to get compensated by insurance or a crook, or they «talk up» what happened.
As an example of that, a victim who fell asleep drunk on a park bench and had his stuff stolen will claim he was robbed. As the police finally reaches the criminal – the usual pickpocket – it feels wrong from the start. «We know from the times before that this thief is not actually violent,» said Mr Vares, the investigator.
The thief, once caught, confirms that and says he just took the things from the pockets of a sleeper. For the victim, however, this could serve a suspicion regarding false testimony. «As we ask why he cooked up the robbery, they say that then there will at least be a search happening,» said Mr Vares.