It’s been interesting to watch the development of the discussion. A decade ago, the tendency was to treat this as a pseudo problem. Back then, the dominating arguments were the so-called deservedly-so and the single-case-claims related to certain ladies who made more money than men. In media, chief executives were saying this could not be a problem as they don’t have it in their company. Examples were underlined of successful female bosses and specialties where women were paid better than the guys. And, the problem nonexistent, the need to discuss it was absent.
A few years later it started to be acknowledged that the issue might be serious. In response to that, part of the society put defences up. In the emotionless statistical figures, they saw indirect accusations towards the state, the government, the bosses or the males as such. Instead of the problem, what was focussed on was twisted methodology, the issue itself downgraded to feminist weirdness or political propaganda.
In the years that followed, the development was towards recognizing the problem. A social ministry study in 2012 on awareness of gender wage gap in Estonia revealed most were aware. Close to half of those interviewed deemed the problem a very big one. Indeed: not limited to meaning a smaller salary, inferior lifestyle and inferiority in the now, wage gap also translates into lower pensions in the future and an overall contradiction to the principle that people should be treated the same irrespective of gender, age, nationality or beliefs.