Thirteen self-governments appealed to the Supreme Court to halt the amendment, seeking the right to decide on what would be the best way to organize waste handling within their administrative territory considering the size of the population.
The local governments' wish met with opposition from the government and the Waste Management Association.
Local authorities retain the right to hold a tender for waste transport services which enables waste producers to make service charge settlements based on prices determined under competition. Self-governments also retain the right to designate existing waste handling centers as waste management facilities without competition.
The law firm Sorainen that represented a number of local self-governments in waste-related matters said the Supreme Court ruling gives local authorities greater legal clarity as regards the organization of waste management.