Mr Bauert also tabled the political card. Nabala is located in Harju-Rapla election district, important for Reform Party. Here, in last elections, Prime Minister Andrus Ansip took nearly 19,000 votes. Reform party harvesting over a third of the region’s votes, the question arises: isn’t environment minister Keit Pentus-Rosimannus preserving her party’s popularity by pushing the reserve?
As also pointed out by Mr Bauert, local elections tend to favour politicians who promise to ward off miners and create nature reserves – denial usually a successful tactic in politics.
By size, Nabala reserves of construction-class limestone come 4th in Estonia. The deposits, located in lads of Kiili, Kose, Saku and Kohila communes, are very important for Tallinn. By size, Maardu deposits would be better, but housing areas have made open diggings impossible there. Therefore, building companies look to Nabala.
Thus, construction company Riverito (parent to Merko Ehitus) and limestone products plant are applying for quarries in Nabala. The processing of applications, however, has been halted by environment minister.
The companies sued the decision. And lost.
Among other things, Tallinn Circuit Court ruled that scientists’ opinions presented by the companies – that quarries cannot harm a nonexistent karstic area – meant nothing.
«The nature reserve was proposed not due to kart alone, but to protect other riches (botanical, for instance). The study in question has been done by a person educated a geologist who is obviously not competent enough in plant ecology and botany,» reads the circuit court decision.