The aforementioned «independence» was declared at the 2nd Congress of all Moscow-aligned deputies—a power struggle tactic that had impressed the West at the time, originating in the crumbling Soviet Union, particularly in Estonia. Initiated by the «right people», that is the popular fronts and national directors and chairmen, it was quickly countered by representatives of the Russkiy Mir.
It is no coincidence that Estonian Supreme Soviet deputy Vladimir Lebedev was present at the Tiraspol congress, representing the Interregional Council of Deputies (formed in Kohtla-Järve). In fact, he represented certain cities or districts in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Leningrad. Moscow has always used similar methods in its critical border regions.
While Russia formally recognizes Moldova's territorial integrity, the Russian ambassador to Chișinău was nonetheless present at the event, endorsing the region's independence.
In the present day, PMR—known in Romanian and Moldovan as the Republica Moldovenească Nistreană, and more commonly as Transnistria—is led by Vadim Krasnoselsky, who surprisingly announced during the anniversary celebrations that the term «Transnistria» should be abandoned in favor of the Russian «Pridnestrovie».
It turned out that Krasnoselsky had, in the meantime, turned into a philologist-politician, as he explained that the word «Transnistria», meaning «beyond the Nistru River» (Dniestr in Russian) from the Romanian perspective, is associated with fascism and Nazism. He stated, «For me, Transnistria, as a term meaning beyond the Dniester River, has come to represent hunger, destruction, killing, blood – the Holocaust.» What a combination! Krasnoselsky contrasted this with «Pridnestrovie», which simply means the area along the Dniester River.