»On the other hand, the opposition also needs levers to play its role, especially when the government threatens to overstep constitutional limits with the support of a parliamentary majority,« he added.
»I have already said that if the work of the Riigikogu gets bogged down by obstruction, the Riigikogu itself must find a solution. But a simple principle applies here: don«t do to others what you don»t want done to you. Today«s majority must implement the rules of procedure of the Riigikogu in such a way that the chosen solution would be recognized as fair and reasonable even when it ended up being the minority,» Karis noted.
«By democracy, I also mean informed and critical citizens, whose trust is not only won by a majority in parliament and a government pointing at its election win -- who expect, for every law they have to obey, that the state has made it wisely and carefully. Classification of documents that justify -- or criticize -- draft laws does not increase the trust of citizens,» he added.
According to Karis, when the process of creating a law has been transparent, citizens will have more confidence that it has not been passed in the interests of a few companies or interest groups, that the justifications that accompany the law are not just a sham.
«Free debate is also part of democracy. Hate speech cannot be defined so broadly that it also includes criticism of political beliefs. Sadly, it often happens that criticism of political positions tends to become personal. A good debate culture condemns personal attacks that create nothing of value,» the president added.