«It`s hard for me to quote it word for word, and I won't attempt to, given that the conversation happened two months ago. Sadly, from that conversation, I [she emphasizes] clearly understood that a link was made between the promulgation of the legislative package and funding allocation. It wasn't in an ultimatum form, that if funds aren`t allocated, laws won`t be proclaimed. There were hints about resource shortages and their pace of work, emphasizing that additional resources would facilitate faster operation,» Saks told Postimees.
«I also remember feeling very unpleasantly surprised. I can`t recall my exact words, but I conveyed that it crossed a line. The president cannot just withhold legislation proclamations. As far as I`m aware, it can only happen if there`s a conflict with the Constitution. We parted ways. We didn`t quarrel, but the meeting ended on an unpleasant note. The incident disturbed me, and I informed the minister,» Saks added.
Sildam described it as a casual conversation during an event.
«We discussed the office`s budget, general topics, and legislative drafts. I certainly didn`t make a demand like, 'you provide the funds, and then we`ll promulgate the bills.' I`m sorry that Merike Saks interpreted it the way she did,» Sildam told Postimees.
«We`ve known each other for years; she could`ve called me or even asked me on the spot. However, I`ll seriously heed the advice of Peep Jahilo, the head of the president`s office, in future interactions with politicians or officials, to avoid using overly playful or ironic rhetoric which can eventually be misinterpreted,» Sildam said.