The Government Office is working on crisis preparedness legislation to merge the Emergency Situation Act, National Defense Act and the State of Emergency Act. Two decades ago, the functions of the Government Office were divided between ministries, while the new law would once again increase the office’s role. Why is that necessary?
The idea of the Preparedness Act follows actual crises, what we have learned. A major all-encompassing crisis requires central management. We cannot have the interior ministry giving orders to the social ministry and vice versa in a crisis. Leadership needs to be centered around the prime minister in such situations. The idea of the law is to make sure civil agencies stand ready to solve crises. This requires central leadership.
Have you also heeded the lessons of the coronavirus crisis?
The Preparedness Act emulates Finland in many aspects. The late Johannes Kert spent much of his time preparing this law. However, it is not a wartime law as we need to be prepared for very different crises. The coronavirus crisis is one example.
Will the Government Office also be in charge should Lukashenko and Putin send us cross-border migrants?
That is rather a military matter in the administrative area of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. The aim of the law is to have all agencies working in a coordinated fashion.