Auditors general before me have said that the state budget bill needs to give the Riigikogu the chance to decide something. Because, generally speaking, it is up to the Riigikogu to decide where money is to be spent to a sensible degree of detail, of course. Secondly, MPs need to have a clear overview and idea of where the budget aims to invest. This change needs to happen. Pointing to what is an abnormal situation did not start with this audit, rather, it suggests we are now in big trouble. Would we simply settle for the first five sections of some other law being wrong?! No one wants to even imagine that. Spelling mistakes alone are enough to render the process embarrassing. While we are talking about the state budget bill that is said to be the most important state document!
Let me assure you it is not a political problem. No, it is purely a bureaucratic issue. We have no data to suggest money has gone missing. The current model entails no danger of misappropriation.
It seems the mess has been contributed to by many governments?
Making the process out to be political would be the worst outcome as it would lead to a hunt for a culprit. It is a systemic error that needs to be corrected.
However, does the key to solving the problem lie with the government?
In the end, it is the Riigikogu that decides what kind of a budget Estonia gets, not the finance ministry. The State Budget Act is a framework act that describes the process. Therefore, if the ministry refuses to fix the problem, the Riigikogu will have to.