Veerpalu was helped by attorney Aivar Pilv who managed to prove that norms were determined using an insufficient sample, making it impossible to convict Veerpalu. When the limits were later fixed based on norms accepted by the Court of Arbitration for Sport, it was found that Veerpalu’s test sample would have been positive.
The solution to Šmigun-Vähi’s scandal from before the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics came four winters later when the court allegedly decided her basic rights had been violated because neither the skier nor her representative were allowed to be present for the opening of her B-sample.
The doping case of Tammjärv and Veerpalu junior is completely different. We are not talking about positive doping samples that could be challenged this time. Round-the-clock surveillance has established all five athletes visited members of a doping network. One local athlete (either Dominik Baldauf or Max Hauke who came in sixth in the team sprint) was caught with the syringe still in their arm.
Abundance of surveillance data
The police have mountains of surveillance on the athletes visiting doping providers before and during the championships. Luckily, the five skiers are not treated as members of the criminal group and shouldn’t face charges on par with the main perpetrators. Nevertheless, doping is a criminal offense in Austria.