Reports suggest that further social media expenses were not compensated. Compensation for expenses in March and April came to €403. Helme’s Facebook page got at least 41,686 new visits during a campaign in February. Facebook sent the politician an invoice for €200. Benefits documentation also reveals Facebook asked Helme to pay for engagement of adult Estonians.
Why did the Riigikogu stop compensating Helme for expenses? “Expenses are compensated in part in cases where MPs ask for it or where they have used up their benefit,” was the explanation.
In total, Helme used €703 of his expenses benefit to pay for highlighting of social media posts.
The Board of the Riigikogu has decided that the benefit can be used to cover costs on transport, mail and communications, business trips, office supplies, training, representation, reception, translation, accommodation, studies and analyses.
The list does not include publicity costs which is how Martin Helme explained his expenses. One document has been designated “publicity for voters on Facebook” by Helme.
Strangers can be bothered for money
Cases where public funds have been used for election campaigns or advertisements have been investigated by the Party Financing Monitoring Committee (ERJK) in the past. Some cases have even ended up in court. Heads of Tallinn, led by former mayor Edgar Savisaar, tried to present several politically-flavored campaign events organized using city funds as publicity campaigns.