Defender of Allik and Kilk, Margus Kurm, said in his opening speech that the prosecutor lacks evidence to suggest gratuities were given in exchange for a specific benefit. The lawyer pointed out that a one-day business trip is taxing and attempts to treat it as a benefit incomprehensible. „These kinds of client events are commonplace in both the public and private sector,“ the defense attorney said.
Embezzlement charges concern four trips, including to Nice and Tenerife, paid for in part by PERH and software developer Helmes AS. Tõnis Allik and Marko Kilk took their partners.
The defense maintains that embezzlement charges are based on a calculation error. Even though Kilk's partner and Allik's wife accompanied the men to Nice, PERH did not have to pay for plane tickets (bought by Helmes – ed.), whereas the fact the women stayed in the same room as their partners had no effect on the price of rooms.
Head and owner of Helmes, treated as the injured party in this case, Jaan Pillesaar said during the investigation that the hospital produced expenses documents the contents of which were inaccurate. The IT company believed heads of the hospital were marketing software in foreign countries. This concerns the episode of fraud Kilk and Allik stand accused of. Helmes AS has allegedly suffered damages in the volume of €10,000.