Even though it turned out last fall that the board needs €148 million inside the next ten years to maintain current capacity, the sustainability of the rescue model makes for a topic few dare to discuss on the eve of local elections. The reason for this is simple: the reform could hit rescue workers, local governments, and residents hard.
One place where a corresponding analysis has already been carried out is the Estonian Academy of Internal Security's Rescue College. Assistant at the college Andres Mumma believes Estonia is maintaining a far more capable rescue network than needed.
The number of fires has been dropping persistently and sharply. Instead rescue workers must deal with a lot of other cases tied to population aging: the need to provide assistance, open doors for emergency medical care teams, and animal rescue.
“No fewer than 95 percent of Estonian settlement units see fewer than a single residential building fire a year. If we are to maintain professional rescue commandos for that, the cost-benefit ratio will never add up,” Mumma said.
Statistics seems to corroborate his claims. Maintaining a professional round the clock commando with four shifts costs €300,000 a year. In 2015, Estonia had seven commandos that responded to so few calls that every single one ended up costing more than €3,000. Estonia has more rescue commandos per 100,000 residents than Latvia, Lithuania, Sweden, and Norway.