«Clearly, they are also protecting then political council, so God forbid there would be political liability. I would ask, however, where was the council,» said Mr Talvik.
The other key issue will be if the bad contract was linked with the bribes from shipyards, which Mr Kiil and Mr Kaljurand are suspected in.
«I think a large part here is incompetence, as Port of Tallinn had not been into shipbuilding before and I really suspect this was lack of competence,» suggested Mr Talvik.
Randel Länts, then a Sod Dems member in the port council, recalls the discussions of the contract were not too detailed.
«I remember we had the building timeline and general prices on the table. We definitely did not talk about any risk management related to the contract, then,» said Mr Länts. «Looking back, I may indeed see that the council had too much good faith and trust towards those who handled it.»
A long-serving port council chairman Neinar Seli says it is unjust to hold council members responsible because council takes decisions based on materials prepared by board.
«If of the council anybody ought to know the issue more thoroughly it is only the chairman (then Remo Holsmer – O. K.),» said Mr Seli. «At the meeting, the rank and file members rather look left and right to see who votes how and take their decisions according to that.»