At Forsmark Nuclear Power Plant in Sweden on April 28, radioactive particles were detected on clothing worn by staff. The Swedes went on a search where these were from. Thirty years back, this was the initial hint to the free world about a severe nuclear disaster in Western part of the Soviet Union with contaminated clouds spreading across Europe.
Editorial: traces of the fear of Chernobyl
True to the Soviet system, the first thing was to keep mum about the fatal mistake made at testing of a reactor.
The effects proved to be colossal: an area comparable to three quarters of Estonia turned unusable and/or uninhabitable. Only on day two, the powers begun evacuating the population. The last inhabitants were moved out a month later.
Due to the secrecy and forced measures characteristic to the communist regime, fear and distrust added a dimension – the traces of which are still felt today.
In Estonia, under the Soviet occupation at the time, it was also via Western news channels that word of the disaster was first received. On the sunny April 28th, none in Estonia had any inkling about the «reservist training» looming over 5,000 men or so. The guys were made to clean up radioactive trash with spades... As well as 600,000 others from elsewhere.
By epidemiologists Mati and Kaja Rahu, the health history of Estonians sent to Chernobyl has been investigated for a quarter of a century. As apparent by objective measurements, turns out that the Soviet authorities actually did not let the guys get greatly radiated and their mortality rate from sicknesses and diseases is no larger than other Estonian guys of the same age. Even so, the forced trip to the disaster area had marked their mental health. And why would they have believed, back in 1986, that the opaque and lying regime was telling them the truth about radiation doses received? For years, they lived with the fear.
Not difficult, then, to relate to anxiety on Lithuanians about a new nuclear station erected in Astravets, Belarus, chiefly built by Rosatom. The station is way nearer to The Lithuanian capital Vilnius than the Belorussian capital Minsk. Not much to be trusted, either, in the Soviet-type regime of Belorussian dictator Mr Lukashenka. What will they do is a disaster strikes?
The Belorussian plant and its safety measures are under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision. By every disaster, technical and political lessons have been learned. True: the probability of a catastrophe is low, while the outcome may be so disastrous that none wants the fresh lesson. Understood, therefore, the fear and distrust in Lithuanians.