When comparing educational costs of GDP per person, Estonia spends the successful states average on primary and basic education. In the financing of gymnasium education, Estonia is doing even better by exceeding the OECD average by two percentage points. In practice, this is expressed in approaches as free textbooks and lunch.
With pre-school education, the picture is totally different. Here we are almost twice below the OECD average which is achieved by Latvia, for instance. The reasons are simple: pre-school education is left for the local governments with their scarcer means. Meanwhile, the «cheapness» is mainly because kindergarten teachers are depressingly underpaid.
As told Postimees by an OECD education report author Paulo Santiago, the figure shouldn’t be treated lightly as it is reflecting an educational system breeding inequality.
«Studies show that pre-school study has a very strong impact on a pupil’s school life and later happiness in life. Let me put it in economic terms: early investment in a child’s education yields more to society than a late investment,» said Mr Santiago.
As explained by the expert, Estonia’s current choice to invest in gymnasium education and provide free higher education primarily serves the interests of private business. But better pre-school education would serve to iron out socio-economic differences of children early on, and a larger part of them would attain to better education. With fewer of problematic adults, the whole society would benefit.