Meanwhile, not all agree that the reburial is the best idea. These past few months, a debate has been stirred both sides of the Baltic Sea as some Estonians in Stockholm say there is no basis enough to disturb the peace of the grave.
Heading the opposition, Jüri-Karl Seim said reburial would only be for the rare occasions such as with political will expressed or as desired by near relatives. With Ms Under, we are not talking of a former Estonian stateswoman, neither does she have immediate relatives in Estonia, said the expert of Estonian graves in Sweden. A letter by a distant relative written after Ms Under’s daughter passed away is not basis to disturb peace of the grave, said Mr Seim.
Also, the foundation’s initiative diverges from their earlier actions. «The same letter has been discussed at the foundation before and then they said «no». Why didn’t they rebury Ms Under in the second half of 1990ies when it was also on agenda?» asked Mr Seim.
He claims the actual reason is expiry of the maintenance contract regarding the gravesite, and the advanced age of members of the foundation. In private conversations, several representatives of the foundation now say the reburial might be a gift by the refugees as Estonia turns 100.
Janika Kronberg of Estonian Writers’ Union says these claims are without basis and the arguments of the personal kind. «The real reason is they fear that as the grave goes, there will be an empty hole in Estonian culture in Sweden,» analysed Ms Kronberg.
Marie Under and Artur Adson with family fled to Sweden in September 1944. Mr Adson passed away in 1977, Ms Under in 1980.