Thus, keeping the topic up adds a forward-looking and ethical level to it, not limited to politics. Even if nothing really happens and the half century under occupation goes uncompensated.
On the other hand, one would like to know for what considerations the ministers-level initiative at this very moment – considering the slowness and reluctance to do so before. What are the calculations and how does it fit with the present foreign political framework?
To think that Russian Federation as legal successor to USSR does not care is ignorance. Why has Russia been so scared of references to Tartu Peace Treaty and the Baltic legal continuity in new agreements? As, then, they would have to acknowledge that for half century the USSR occupied the Baltics and logic would dictate that compensating the damages comes up. Well known to all, as to Russians: Germany has paid damages for Nazi actions to certain nations.
Among the Baltics, Lithuania has been the strongest to voice the damages issue. Estonian governments have opted to think pragmatic. There have been no hopes to ever get compensated, and in practical relations we have focussed on the present and the future while clinging to the legal consistency principle. On the other hand, as early as in 1992 a committee at Riigikogu was tasked to assess the damage. Efficient and active, the committee produced dozens of reports and a «White Book» report in 2005.