From there, we can be talking about the political, ethical and human rights aspect of this and then these certain «buts» come to play as mentioned by some parties yesterday. The stand that though the attack against human lives in deplorable yet indirectly justified or explained by origin or skin colour of the attacked is frightening. Especially cynical to think that, indirectly, the attack was caused by those valuing tolerance and equal rights.
One is sure: our daily reality is somewhat altered, after yesterday. Social media and statements/silence by politicians cannot be viewed the same way. Indeed, signs of intolerance were in the air before. However, some chance anger triggered by Internet comments or populist politicians is one thing. It’s another thing when, due to the anger, an attack is launched at dozens of lives.
How do we continue from here? Peacefully and rationally. Always remembering that differing stands need to be accepted. That takes all parts of the society acting together. The politicians who opted not to respond to call by President Ilves to take a stand, thinking it best to be quiet, ought to feel their responsibility regarding where we are headed. Talking is more than party gain; it’s about the big picture.