That means, for instance: to obtain the rights of a subject specialist, a valid employment contract with Innove is needed. «By such contract, a subject specialist gets the rights to only deal with tasks related to that specific subject, but he will not be able to see information related to organisation of the tests which, in the information system, is under another role – that of the organisation specialist,» said Ms Aab.
She said outside-the-house users have no accounts in the system. «To award and to add rights, main user of the information system needs to manually do the relevant procedure and his activity will leave a trace which the main user himself cannot alter,» she explained.
Based on the information published in Postimees, the Innove representative said it could be claimed with assurance that the person who promised to alter the results did not know what he was talking about. «In such a way it is not possible to alter exam results,» noted Ms Aab.
On Wednesday, Postimees wrote about a University of Tartu Institute of Physics research fellow called Fred who, in an ads portal, offered an outwardly usual consultation for examinations. However, those who contacted him found out the man was actually promising to alter state exam results in the corresponding system. For payment, he desired the 12th graders as his mistresses for three months.
The scandalous scheme was disclosed by journalistic experiment by Postimees. According to police, the behaviour of research fellow Fred lacks elements of criminal offence. To provide legal assessment, prosecutor’s office took an extra day.