But now it gets more interesting yet.
Coaches. First, the nominates.
Mr Nabi’s instructor Henn Põlluste. Right.
Mr Kanter’s instructor Indrek Tustit. By job title, physiotherapist, but much more in reality. Even so, how many of the jury consider Mr Tustit a coach?
Mr Mägi’s instructor – a duo: Anne and Taivo Mägi. This is a novelty, yet reasonable, as hardly could one be preferred to the other. The duo was set up by Athletic Association.
Epee team instructor Kaido Kaaberma. Logical, though the team includes none trained by him. The grapevine says Mr Kaaberma plays a big role in the team’s medals due to his ability to prevent intrigues and conflicts. Without Mr Kaaberma, it is said, the fencers’ personal trainers would be at each other’s throats with nothing remaining of unity of team i.e. of success.
Erika Kirpu’s instructor ... isn’t among the nominates. In reality, they would be two, as Ms Kirpu is also trained by a tandem – Igor Tšikinjov and Viktor Kirpu –, who also divide the prize money.
As explained by Estonian Fencing Association secretary-general Jüri Salm, leaving out Ms Kirpu’s trainers and only nominating Mr Kaaberma was a decision taken by the association leadership. Mr Salm pointed back to last year’s elections where the coaches of world champs Nikolai Novosjolov and Julia Beljajeva – Igor Tšikinjov and Natalja Kotova – ate one another’s votes and thus Mr Põlluste took the title.
«Sure, it wasn’t an easy thing to decide,» admitted Mr Salm. «And many were offended. But we found the one who forged a silver medal did better.»
Mr Salm said the fencers were sorry they failed to take the entire prize set last year – failing to get the top coach title – and this year they also hope to have four out of five: «If not, we have taken a step back and will have to get better.»