Thereby, election of any church leader is a matter of civil society, not of the state. Same goes for a Lutheran EELK archbishop. Doubtless, the church council decision carries great weight for EELK itself. But what will be the weight of it, and the weight of the future archbishop, to the society?
On the one hand, for Estonia the Lutheran Church’s influence is far from what it was a century ago, and even from what it is for some Northern neighbours. Clearly, the membership is melting and role in society in decline. On the other hand, even today this is a largest civil society organisation.
An issue being, will EELK with the new archbishop at helm go along with the liberalisation and openness of society, investing into it – or opting to remain a stronghold for social conservatism. As pointed out in a Postimees opinion article by theologian Alar Laats, in our neighbouring states’ Lutheran churches both are represented – the liberal options in Finland, the social conservatism in Latvia. Says Mr Laats: «For the younger and more educated generation, this image of EELK is rather unpleasant – a small church with a Moscow-like world view and Uganda-like politics. Even is a caricature of the facts, is still serves to a degree to describe the clerical reality.»