"There exists a resolution adopted by the UN by which each country is invited to set up a national institution for the protection of human rights, and it also has its own specific accreditation procedures and the accreditation must meet the so-called Paris principles, which arise from the corresponding decision of the UN," Kari Kasper, manager of the Estonian Human Rights Center, told journalists at a presentation of the center's annual report for 2012.
"There is no such institution in Estonia. It exists in most member states of the EU, but in Estonia no institution engaging in the protection of human rights, the chancellor of justice or the commissioner [on gender equality and equal treatment], or the Data Protection Inspectorate, for instance, has sought such status for itself and would probably not meet the criteria either," Kasper said.
"What we do have of course is that each state institution must base its actions on observance of human rights, fundamental rights and rights set out in the Constitution," said Kasper. "Getting more specific, we see that concrete ministries have concrete areas of responsibility for certain human rights, but at times they overlap, when we talk about, for instance, the competence of the Ministry of Social Affairs in equal treatment and the competence of the Ministry of Culture in national minorities and integration," he said. "There are certain areas that are not covered at all, where no ministry has a specific area of responsibility, and that to my mind serves as an obstacle to this work to some degree."